Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer Firm Overview Attorney Profiles Case Results Client Reviews Speaking Engagements Frequently Asked Questions Case Evaluation Contact Us
Columbus DUI Attorney Click to Call
Client Reviews Video Information Center

Trunk Searches & Odor of Marijuana

I just finished a case where my client was coming back from a festival in Michigan with two of her friends. My client was a backseat passenger and her friends were in the front of the vehicle. The vehicle was pulled over for speeding. The trooper stated he could smell the odor of burning marijuana and ordered the occupants out.

The occupants admitted there was marijuana in the passenger compartment which the trooper found. He placed them all under arrest. He then moved on to the trunk. He found a duffel bag loaded with every hallucinogen and party drug you can imagine. The case jumped up to 3rd degree felony drug trafficking and possession.

The question is, "Can a police officer search a locked trunk after arresting someone for marijuana possession?"

The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that "[o]nce a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains contraband, he or she may search a validly stopped motor vehicle based upon the well-established automobile exception to the warrant requirement." State v. Moore, 90 Ohio St.3d 47, 51, 2000 Ohio 10, 734 N.E.2d 804 (holding that the [**12] odor of marijuana justified an automobile search).

Additionally, in State v. Greenwood, 2nd Dist. No. 19820, 2004 Ohio 2737, the court noted that an officer's observation of marijuana on the passenger seat and floorboard gave him probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained contraband. Therefore, he was entitled to search the entire vehicle, including the trunk and its contents. Greenwood, supra, at ¶11, citing United States v. Ross (1982), 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572.

Just several weeks ago, the 5th District Court of Appeals held: "we find that in the present case, Trooper Wilson had sufficient probable cause to search the trunk of the vehicle. He smelled burnt marijuana and found marijuana in the passenger compartment of the car in plain view. In addition, Appellant gave him a false name, and the driver of the vehicle made an attempt to get into the trunk as she was walking towards Trooper Wilson's cruiser." State v. Whatley, 2011 Ohio 2297, P29-P30 (Ohio Ct. App., Licking County May 9, 2011)

Ohio Case Results
DUI Defense
BMV Hearing
Columbus Ohio DUI / OVI
Delaware Ohio DUI / OVI
DUI With Injury
Fairfield County Ohio DUI / OVI
Licking Ohio DUI / OVI
Multiple DUI
Ohio DUI / OVI Case Results
Ohio DUI / OVI Overview
Ohio DUI / OVI Penalties
Underage DUI
Serious Vehicular Crimes
Aggravated Vehicular Assault
Aggravated Vehicular Homicide
Drag Racing
Nitrous Oxide & Motor Vehicle
Ohio Fleeing & Eluding
Ohio Hit-Skip
Reckless Driving
Drug Crimes
Deception of Obtaining Drugs
Drug Cultivation
Drug Paraphernalia
Drug Trafficking / Sale
Heroin
Possession of Drug Documents
Possession of Drugs
Rx Drug Chart
Trafficking Marijuana
Vicodin
High School and College Cases
ADD/ ADHD & Teen Use
Affluence & Teen Use
Alcohol & Teens
Cocaine & Teens
Heroin and Teens
Marijuana & Teens
Turbulent Teens: Advice for Parents
Underage Possession of Alcohol
Theft Crimes
Credit Card Fraud
Embezzlement
Forgery
Fraud
Investment Fraud
Mortgage Fraud
Stock Broker Misconduct
Workers' Comp Fraud
Sex Crimes
Computer Sex Crimes
Disseminating Matter Harmful to Juveniles
Gross Sexual Imposition
Importuning
Ohio Offense Tiers
Ohio Sex Offender Registration
Public Indecency
Rape
Sexual Battery
Sexual Imposition
Unlawful Sexual Conduct
Voyeurism
Other Offenses
Bench Warrants
Bond Hearings
Criminal Damaging
Disorderly Conduct
Domestic Violence/Assault
Juvenile Crimes
Probation Violations
Vandalism
Click to Call Ccriminal Defense Blog
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Message:

Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

NOTICE: The act of inquiring about representation to The Koffel Law Firm does not establish a client-lawyer relationship. Your inquiry will be kept confidential. Submitting an inquiry does not obligate The Koffel Law Firm to respond. Also, a confidential inquiry on this website does not prevent The Koffel Law Firm from representing a co-defendant or adverse party.